Showing posts with label
reviewing
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
reviewing
.
Show all posts
Friday, March 4, 2016
Pulling a fast one: getting unscientific nonsense into scientific journals. (or, how PLOS ONE f*#ked up)
›
The basis of all of science is that we can explain the natural world through observation and experiments. Unanswered questions and unsolved ...
Monday, September 8, 2014
Edicts for peer reviewing
›
Reviewing is a right of passage for many academics. But for most graduate students or postdocs, it is also a bit of a trial by fire, since r...
Monday, August 26, 2013
Everything you wanted to know about peer review (but no one mentions)
›
Since the British Ecological Society has published an introduction to reviewing successfully , here’s a short list of additional, less noted...
Thursday, August 15, 2013
Everything you ever wanted to know about peer review, but were afraid to ask
›
The thing about peer review is that there isn't much of an education process. Maybe you've published a paper or two and experienced ...
4 comments:
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Review or publish; the curse of the commons
›
Need we be concerned about the volume and quality of manuscript reviews for journal submissions? In a recent editorial published in Ecology ...
›
Home
View web version