A network of graduate students has started a new blog called 'BioDiverse Perspectives'. The purpose of this blog is to explore and compile seminal papers in biodiversity science. In some ways this mode of knowledge gathering replaces existing 'Foundations of...' compilations of classic papers. Instead, this blog creates an ever-evolving dialogue about our understanding of the different dimensions of biodiversity. Check it out!Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Exploring biodiversity science: The BioDiverse Perspectives blog
A network of graduate students has started a new blog called 'BioDiverse Perspectives'. The purpose of this blog is to explore and compile seminal papers in biodiversity science. In some ways this mode of knowledge gathering replaces existing 'Foundations of...' compilations of classic papers. Instead, this blog creates an ever-evolving dialogue about our understanding of the different dimensions of biodiversity. Check it out!Tuesday, January 29, 2013
A different kind of ecological diversity: on sticking out in academia
This is a guest post from Sarah Hasnain, currently a PhD student in ecology at Queen's University. Sarah did her MSc at the University of Toronto with Brian Shuter on the interplay between environmental and evolutionary processes underlying thermal response in freshwater fish. Sarah was an office mate of mine for a while at the University of Toronto, and we had some interesting conversations about balancing cultural backgrounds and academia.
By the time that I was nine years old, I
already knew that I wanted to do something in science. By the time I was
eleven, my grandparents had patiently explained that in order to be a research
scientist, I need to complete something called a PhD. And by thirteen, after
brief flirtations with physics (which seemed cool at the time, and still is),
mathematics, and history, I had decided to pursue a career as an ecologist.
My family supported me in my goal of being
a scientist, even though they didn't
know what an ecologist was. And as an undergraduate in Canada’s largest,
most multicultural city, I didn’t stand out from my fellow classmates, who
similarly came from all over the globe. And yet surprisingly, in addition to
the usual student woes about finding scholarships, funding and the right
academic advisors, the fact that I am a Pakistani female (and until recently a
Hijabi) always seemed to play a role in how people responded to my goals. I
continue to be asked to explain my career choice and my passion for science on
a regular basis by colleagues, faculty members and
visiting scientists which was and
continues to be emotionally exhausting. For example, a senior faculty member
followed me to the lab that I worked in as an undergraduate research student,
to confirm that I actually worked there. People always came to my posters at conference
poster sessions, but a number of them wantied to tell me that they
are very glad to have someone “like you” here. One of the determining factors
for which PhD labs I wanted to be in was that during the interview, at no point
did the potential supervisor asks what made someone from my cultural, ethnic
and religious background decide to pursue ecological research. This actually
knocked a few labs out of the running.
I understand that my career choice is
interesting, considering that ecology is not a field that has historically
attracted many Pakistani women. And it’s undeniable that these comments and
questions are about people wanting to be open and accepting and welcoming to
me. But I can’t help but feel that the constant questions about my background
insinuate, probably unintentionally, that my ethnic, religious and cultural
affiliations are more interesting than my research. As an ecologist belonging
to a minority group, these questions can have the opposite effect – instead of
feeling accepted by their interest, I feel like I am constantly justifying my
existence in this field. I imagine that for many minority ecologists, the
underlying message is that they don't belong here.
Of course I don’t represent all minority,
or Pakistani female ecologists. Probably some individuals would appreciate this
interest in their background. But others, like myself, may not. Regardless of
ethnic, cultural or religious affiliations, ecology is not the expected career
choice in North American society. Why is someone like me interested in ecology?
Because I like it. Just like everyone else here.
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Understanding modern human society through the lens of evolution
Book review of Edmund Russell’s ‘Evolutionary History’
We often think about the ways in which evolution has shaped
this world, from the amazing diversity of cichlid fishes in the African Great Lakes,
to Australian marsupials that seem to replicate strategies that placental
mammals have evolved elsewhere (e.g., Tasmanian tiger and the North American
wolf). We even look at our own bodies or behaviors to find evolution’s imprint
–why do I have a non-functional appendix attached to my intestine? However, we
seldom look to important events in human history to examine the effects of
evolution, yet, according to Edmund Russell, human history can be better
understood through evolution –like my appendix.
Russell is advocating for a new field of inquiry within the
study of human history –namely, evolutionary history. When I first read the
book jacket, I must admit that I was skeptical. However, this book makes the
compelling case that historians gain a much fuller understanding past events by
including evolution. Russell’s main claim is that modern civilization is the
product of an evolution revolution. Even Russell’s unremarkable dog “Riley,
like all dogs, is a testament to the extraordinary power of human beings to
shape the evolution of other species”. While citing dogs may seem like a
trivial example, it was coevolution that shaped this relationship. Wolves that
were less aggressive and less fearful, which tend to be more puppy-like, found
benefits by associating with human groups. Human groups that tolerated the
presence of these wolves were likely alerted to approaching threats. Even the
fact that dogs bark is a product of this relationship. This evolution
revolution can similarly explain the domestication of other animals and plants,
and ultimately produces the necessary conditions for permanent large
settlements.
An important and intriguing underlying theme of this book is
that these evolutionary revolutions are not often the product of conscious
effort. We are used to the narrative that highlights humans as selecting
individuals and driving the evolution towards some goal. But this would require
early peoples knowing what they wanted in the end, having a specific goal. In
the dog example, do we really think that early humans thought ‘hey, I would
like a poodle’? No, the reality is that canines and human changed with one
another producing a mutually beneficial outcome. Even the domestication of many
of the earliest crop species likely resulted from lazy and sloppy humans. Lazy
because humans probably harvested the easiest, most accessible fruits and seeds
–selecting for bigger, easily removed fruits that ripened at the same time.
Sloppy because seeds were discarded around settlements. Then that laziness
again means we looked to those nearby plants for harvesting. Thus evolution has
continually informed the development of human civilization and produced the
much of the cultural norms today.
While modern cultures may consciously drive evolution
through selective breeding and genetic engineering, we are immersed in an
evolving world. Diseases that are resistant to drugs, pest that are immune to
pesticides, and commercial fish that are now smaller and reproduce earlier are
examples of important evolutionary changes that affect human activities and
economics. Russell provides evidence that evolution is in part responsible for
the industrial revolution, due to some varieties of cotton evolving particular
features.
Taken all together, Russell admirably succeeds in his goal
of convincing the reader that evolution has influenced much of human
civilization. Moreover, his intended audience of historians should be
re-assessing previous explanations of important human events by asking the
basic question: how has evolutionary change influenced major changes in human
history.
Edmund Russell. 2011. Evolutionary History. Cambridge
University Press.
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Bob Paine's footprint
A great post by Ed Yong on Bob Paine's influence on ecology -both conceptually and numerically, with a large number of academic children and grandchildren.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
