data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83ff3/83ff37fabfdf8f99e51947eebe59548a0aee31ea" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94a3d/94a3db98ef1a643f7cc2aab4b76a8a4de5beb8e1" alt=""
In a combined study using field data and evidence of two experimental studies Eriksson et al. show that decline of top-predators and nutrient load have similar and additive effects on the abundance of ephemeral algae. Both factors together increased abundance of ephemeral algae many times! The field data revealed a strong negative correlation between the abundance of fish and ephemeral algae. When fish was depleted high abundances of their prey and at the same time high cover of ephemeral algae was observed. The experiments very nicely proofed these observations. By excluding predatory fish Eriksson et al. show that (i) the abundance of small mesopredators increased, (ii) the smaller gastropod grazers became smaller, and (iii) the net production of ephemeral algae increased. Moreover, the predator effect depended on grazers and habitat complexity. In the absence of grazers predator removal had no effect on algae growth. In the absence of canopy cover, i.e. a proxy for habitat complexity ephemeral algae growth doubled.
This paper makes a strong point that to successfully combat eutrophication the so far unidirectional view on either bottom-up or top-down forces should change towards an integrated approach taking into account both factors.
Britas Klemens Eriksson, Lars Ljunggren, Alfred Sandström, Gustav Johansson, Johanna Mattila, Anja Rubach, Sonja Råberg, Martin Snickars (2009) Declines in predatory fish promote bloom-forming macroalgae. Ecological Applications: Vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 1975-1988. doi: 10.1890/08-0964.1
1 comment:
Well I Agree That This paper makes a strong point that to successfully combat eutrophication the so far unidirectional view on either bottom-up or top-down forces should change towards an integrated approach taking into account both factors.
Post a Comment