In a recent paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, Richard Duncan, Alison Boyer and Tim Blackburn use sophisticated
methods to estimate the true magnitude of bird (specifically nonpasserines
–i.e., not perching or songbirds) extinctions on 41 Pacific islands (including
islands from Hawaii, Melanesia, Micronesia and Polynesia). Estimating the
number of extinctions prior to recorded history is an extremely difficult
exercise, but Duncan and colleagues use a set of statistical methods (Bayesian
mark-recapture) to produce reliable estimates. The data available include a
spotty fossil record, and so the researchers needed an appropriate estimate of
the number of species present on islands in the past. To do this they examined
the fossil record and compared it to species that are found there today. Only a
subset was found in the fossil record. From this, they determined how the
number of fossils found, body size of the organisms and island size affected
detection probability. With these informative detection probabilities, they
were able to estimate past richness and compare that to today’s richness – and the
difference is the number of extinctions.
Across these 41 islands, Duncan et al. estimate that human
colonization resulted in at least 983 extinctions. Nine-hundred and
eighty-three species are no longer with us because of the presence of humans. Coupled
with human activities elsewhere, from over-hunting, habitat destruction and the
introduction of non-native species, we responsible for thousands of extinctions.
For the first time in Earth’s history, a single species (us) is the direct
cause for thousands of other species going extinct. A paper such as this is an
important analysis, but it certainly doesn’t make us feel good about ourselves.
Duncan, R., Boyer, A., & Blackburn, T. (2013). Magnitude and variation of prehistoric bird extinctions in the Pacific Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216511110
No comments:
Post a Comment