One of the greatest benefits of attending conferences is
that they represent learning opportunities. I don’t necessarily mean learning
about new techniques or analyses, though you can undoubtedly find out about
these at conferences, but rather conferences are opportunities to hear about
new concepts, ideas and paradigms. In some ways conferences are like a piñata
of ideas –they are chalk full of new ideas but you never know which you’ll pick
up.
Ecosummit is not the typical conference I go to, it is much
more diverse in topics of talks and disciplines of the attendees. This
diversity –from policy makers, to social scientists, to ecologists, means that
I am exposed to a plethora of new concepts. Here are a few nuggets that got me thinking:
- Knowledge-values-rules decision making context. Policy decisions are made at the interface of scientific knowledge, human values (what is important to people –e.g., jobs), and rules (e.g., economic laws). This seems like a nice context to think about policy, though it is not clear about how we prioritize new knowledge or alter values.
- Adaptation services. I work on ecosystem services (e.g., carbon storage, pollination support, water filtration, etc.), but I learned that ecosystems also provide adaptation services. These are aspects of ecosystems that will help human societies adapt to climate change (e.g., new products).
- Trees and air pollution. The naive assumption most of us make about trees in urban areas are that they improve local air quality. However, I saw a couple of talks where this may not necessarily be the case. Some species in North American (red oak, sweet gum, etc.) release volatile organic compounds. Spruce plantations may not take up nitrogen oxides, and in fact might release it. Thus we need to be careful on how we sell the benefits of urban trees.
- Transformative. This is a term I have certainly heard and used before, but in listening to a wide variety of talks, I realize it is used in different contexts to mean different things. I think it best to avoid this term.
- a-disciplinary. I heard a guy say in a talk that he was a-disciplinary and so was not bound to the dogmas and paradigms of any discipline (I already have a hard time wrapping my head around interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, transdisciplinary, etc.). He then presented a new paradigm and a number of prescribed well-formulated tools used to move from idea, communication, to action. I think the irony was lost on him.
